Nimrod, Author at נמרוד ירון ושות׳ https://y-tax.co.il/en/author/nimrod/ מיסוי בינלאומי ומיסוי ישראלי Sun, 28 Sep 2025 09:39:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 https://y-tax.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/cropped-android-chrome-512x512-1-32x32.png Nimrod, Author at נמרוד ירון ושות׳ https://y-tax.co.il/en/author/nimrod/ 32 32 Cost-Plus Method for Transfer Pricing https://y-tax.co.il/en/cost-plus-method-for-transfer-pricing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cost-plus-method-for-transfer-pricing Sun, 28 Sep 2025 07:27:08 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=5202

The cost plus method

When conducting a transfer pricing study, it’s essential to select the most appropriate comparison method to demonstrate that the prices set in a controlled transaction (i.e., a transaction between related parties) are at arm’s length. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) outlines various methods for this purpose in its transfer pricing guidelines, categorizing them into two distinct groups: traditional transaction methods and transaction profit methods. The Cost Plus method falls within the category of traditional transaction methods.

This method compares the gross profit mark up in a controlled transaction to that of a similar uncontrolled transaction.

The cost-plus method is commonly used in industries in which is common to set the price by a adding a mark-up to the cost of goods sold. At times when transactions involve tangible property, manufacturing or assembling activities and relatively simple service are provided, the cost plus method will be usually used.

This method is particularly valuable in cases where semi-finished goods are sold between related parties, where the related parties have joint facility agreements, or where there are long-term buy-and-supply arrangements or the provision of services.

How does the Cost Plus Method work?

First, it’s crucial to identify comparable transactions. Ideally, transactions between the supplier and other unrelated parties (i.e., internal comparables) will be used for this purpose. External transactions involving other unrelated parties can also serve as a guide. Note that a comprehensive analysis should be performed to ensure that the circumstances of the transactions are indeed comparable.

Next, the markup of the comparable transactions should be measured.

Afterward, the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) for the supplier must be calculated. This figure is then multiplied by the markup to determine the transfer pricing, or the arm’s-length price.

According to the OECD guidelines, when applying the Cost Plus method, a controlled transaction and an uncontrolled transaction are deemed comparable if one of the following conditions is met:

  • Differences between the compared transactions or companies do not affect the determination of the cost-plus markup in an open market.

Reasonable adjustments can be made to eliminate the benefits that might arise due to the differences mentioned above.

Example of the application of the cost plus method

Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate the application of the Cost Plus method.

Suppose we have a multinational enterprise (MNE) called Company A, which operates in Country X. Additionally, there is a related party, Company B, operating in Country Y, and an unrelated party, Company C, also conducting business in Country Y.

Company A specializes in manufacturing bags for Company B. Company C also manufacture bags and operates under conditions similar to those of Company A, , earning a markup of 15-20% on its costs.

After conducting a comprehensive comparability analysis, it is determined that these transactions are suitably comparable. The comparable markups identified align with the cost basis employed by Company C, serving as a foundation for implementing the Cost Plus method. Based on this, we can now proceed to calculate the selling price that Company A should set for its sales to Company B.

Let’s assume that the COGS for producing a single bag by Company A amounts to 100$. The calculation unfolds as follows:

Cost of COGS for comapny A = 100$
+ Gross profit mark up (15-20%) = 15$-20$
Arm’s length price = 115$-120$

In essence, the determined arm’s length price for Company A’s sales to Company B ranges between 115$ and 120$.

Advantages

Like all transfer pricing methods, the Cost Plus method has its strengths and weaknesses that require careful consideration before application. No single method is perfect for every scenario; therefore, your choice should be based on a case-by-case analysis.

Some of the advantages of the cost plus method are:

  • Relatively Accessible Data – the Cost Plus method utilizes internal costs– i.e., costs that are directly related to the manufacturing or purchasing of an item or activity. This information is generally readily accessible to the enterprise.
  • Comparability of Functions Preformed – when applying the Cost Plus method, the comparability of the functions preformed is more crucial than the comparability of the products. This is because the functions preformed have a larger impact on the margins.

Disadvantages

Some of the disadvantages or weaknesses of the Cost Plus method include:

  • Cost Determination – First, there are challenges in accurately determining the costs. While enterprises need to cover their costs to sustain their operations, these expenses may not necessarily dictate the appropriate profit for a specific year. Although companies often set prices based on cost, there are times when price and cost are not directly correlated.
  • Cost Allocation Issues – The costs considered in the Cost Plus method are those incurred by the supplier of goods or services. This can create complications in allocating some expenses between the supplier and the purchaser. For example, some costs may be borne by the purchaser, not the supplier, thus lowering the basis for determining costs.
  • One-Sided Analysis – The Cost Plus method involves a one-sided analysis, focusing solely on the manufacturer or the service provider. This may not provide a complete picture of the transaction dynamics between the related parties.

Considerations when applying the Cost Plus Method

Some points should be kept in mind when applying the cost plus method, including,

  • Comparable Cost Basis – It’s essential to ensure that a similar markup is applied to a comparable cost basis when using this method.
  • Accounting Consistency – One critical aspect of comparability is accounting consistency. If there are differences in accounting practices between the controlled and uncontrolled transactions, adjustments should be made to the data. This ensures that the same types of costs are considered in both sets of transactions.
  • Different Expense Types – It’s important to take into account differences in types and levels of expenses. Operating and non-operating expenses may include financial costs tied to the functions performed and the risks assumed by the parties or transactions. Recognizing these differences may necessitate adjustments or additional steps. For example, if costs are associated with functions different from those being tested, separate compensation should be provided for them.
  • Applying Historical Costs – Historical costs should be applied to individual units of production. In some instances, costs may fluctuate over time, such as labor or material costs. In these cases, it may be more appropriate to apply an average cost rather than an annual cost. Averaging costs might also be relevant in situations involving fixed assets and production or processing of multiple products in varying quantities. Additionally, for a more accurate profit estimation, consider including replacement and marginal costs when they can be calculated.

Our firm specializes in international taxation and provides our clients with a comprehensive assistance for their transfer pricing needs. To schedule a consolation call with our team, click here.

Additional articles on transfer prices:

]]>
ESO in the U.S. and Their Tax Implications https://y-tax.co.il/en/stock-based-compensation-in-the-u-s/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=stock-based-compensation-in-the-u-s Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:36:46 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=5511

Stock Based Compensation - ESO

ESO, or employee stock option, is a contract that gives employees the right to buy a specific number of shares of company stock at a specified price called the strike price, within a particular time frame known as the exercise window. Although some of the rules that regulate stock options are imposed by tax and securities laws, others are at the company’s discretion. This allows people to buy shares of a company at an attractive price, oftentimes below market price.

There are various types of ESOs and with that comes different requirements in terms of taxes, disbursement, and corporate structure. One reason companies use stock options as a form of compensation is to retain employees. Some features of ESOs are more beneficial to an employee the longer they work for the company. Additionally, companies can use ESOs to distribute equity of the company, preserving their cash flow. Each company can determine how and to whom ESOs are offered.

Types of ESOs

Equity-classified awards are when the employee has the right to receive equity shares of a company. The amount is measured as the fair value of the shares of the company on the grant date.

Liability-classified awards are when an employee receives cashed based on the value of shares in the agreed upon stock-based compensation plan.

In the United States, most employee stock options are non-transferable and often cannot be immediately exercised, meaning turned into shares. In the U.S., the most common type of stock options, are non-qualified stock options, and are taxed as standard income when they are exercised. Incentive stock options are subject to alternative minimum tax but are not taxed as standard income.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

Non-qualified stock options or (NSOs) can be granted to employees at all levels of a company, as well as to board members and consultants. NSOs are taxed as income for the person who receives the NSO. The corporation is allowed a tax deduction for every dollar the recipient receives in their income.

There are special rules for deferred compensation, known as IRC 409Al. Read it here

Incentive Stock Options

ISOs, or incentive stock options, are a type of employee stock compensation that has some special rules that apply both to the company and the recipient of the option. Specifically, if the recipient of the option does not pay standard taxes (employment or income) on the difference between the exercise price or strike price. ISOs are usually only awarded to top management and highly valued employees. Additionally, ISOs holders are responsible for any long-term capital gain and alternative minimum Tax they may owe if shares are not sold in the same year.

Vesting Period

Vesting is an important concept in the realm of stock compensation. The vesting period refers to the length of time that an employee must wait before they can exercise their ESOs. The period is pre-determined by the company at the grant date. Typically, ESOs vest overtime at predetermine dates and rates. For example, you may be given the option to buy 100 shares, you could vest 25 percent over 4 years, meaning you could buy 25 shares in the company each of the four years.

Risks of Owning ESOs

ESOs have the highest time value at grant (if volatility does not spike soon after you acquire the options). A common mistake is not realizing the significance of time value, even on the grant day, and the opportunity cost of premature or early exercise. The employee has the choice after the option has vested to exercise their option or not. This choice is usually dependent on the market price of the company shares, as the employee will only want to purchase the option if the price is equal to or less then the market price. With such a large time value component it is important to incorporate the time value of money concept when understanding how the value of your options changes overtime indirectly with its stock price.

Contact Nimrod Yaron & Co to learn how we can be of assistance to you and your company.

]]>
Capital Investments Law https://y-tax.co.il/en/capital-investments-law/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=capital-investments-law Mon, 16 May 2022 08:13:03 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?page_id=8723

What is the Encouragement of Capital Investments Law and its benefits?

The Encouragement of Capital Investments Law has undergone many amendments since it was first enacted.  In its original version, The Encouragement Law was intended to attract capital investment to Israel and encourage economic initiative, foreign capital investments, and local capital investments.

In the period following the ratification of Amendment 68, the objectives of the Capital Investment Encouragement Act changed. The objectives have become: to develop the country’s production capacity, improve the business sector’s ability to cope with competitive conditions in international markets, and create infrastructure for new and sustainable jobs. An examination of a company’s compliance with the terms of the law will be made in light of the objectives of the law, as they are presented in its current wording.

The Economic Efficiency Law (legislative amendments for the implementation of economic policy for the 2017 and 2018 fiscal years), led to the addition of Amendment 73 to the Capital Investment Encouragement Law (hereinafter: “Amendment 73”). The purpose of Amendment 73 was to modify the law to encourage the establishment of suitable companies to create branches and expand their activities in Israel. The amendment also set an incentive to encourage new activity in Israel and raise the level of productivity and innovation.

The Three Main Purposes of the Capital Investment Encouragement Law:

  • Develop the country’s production capacity.
  • Improve the ability of the business sector to cope with competitive conditions in international markets.
  • Creating infrastructure for new and sustainable jobs

Corporations must meet the conditions of the Investment Encouragement Act in order to obtain significant tax benefits and applicable grants. Companies that meet the conditions of the law will enjoy significant tax benefits.

Below is a table showing the tax benefits under the Capital Investment Encouragement Law:

Comments

Capital Gains when selling IP

Dividend

Tax

 

Corporate

Tax Rate

Tax Benefits

   

Israeli

Company

Foreign Company

Individual

Other Area Development

Area A Development

 

Dividend to a non-substantial shareholder (25%)

23%

0%

30%

30%

23%

23%

Without a law of encouragement

 

23%

0%

20%

20%

16%

7.5%

Preferred  Enterprise

Foreign Company with full holding

23%

0%

5%

20%

8%

5%

Special Preferred  Enterprise

Foreign Company with over 90% of the shares (obtains capital gains benefits under certain conditions)

12%

0%

4%

20%

12%

7.5%

Technological Preferred  Enterprise

Obtains capital gains benefits under certain circumstances.

6%

0%

4%

20%

6%

6%

Special Preferred  Technological Enterprise

*Possibility of a grant in the case of an industrial plant – the grant rate is 20% of the total approved investments included in the business plan approved for the corporation.

The Main Conditions for the Application of the Capital Investment Encouragement Law on a Preferred Enterprise:

  • The corporation must legally be a preferred company with a “preferred factory” in Israel. A preferred plant is an industrial plant that is a competitive plant as defined below.
  • This is an industrial plant, i.e. most of the company’s activities should be manufacturing, production via raw material (there are some exceptions), or production from scratch.
  • Regarding the existence of a factory – there is no definition of a factory in the law. This indicates that there are no specific conditions of an enterprise that must be met, especially when it comes to software development. Decisions of the Tax Authority such as 6003/19 refer to the existence of an office. For the above taxation decision read here.
    • Excluded from the definition of an “industrial plant”: a mine, a plant whose activity is the production of a natural resource, a plant for the exploration or production of oil as defined in the Oil Law, 1952. Also excluded is an approved agricultural plant as defined in the Law for Encouraging Capital Investments in Agriculture, 1980.
  • The law does not require a certain number of workers to fit the definition of an industrial plant, however, at the time the law was set, the Tax Authority set a minimum number of ten workers. The IRS no longer adheres to this guideline, however, there will still be an advantage to employing a certain number of workers, even if not ten (The condition is required for an industrial plant, whereas a technological plant needs to have an intangible asset owned by the plant).
  • A plant is defined as “competitive” and export if it meets the following conditions:
    1. Its main activity is in the field of biotechnology or nanotechnology, and has been approved by the National Authority for Technological Innovation prior to the approval of the program as stated in this section.
    2. Its income in the tax year from the sale of the enterprise in a particular market does not exceed 75% of its total income in that tax year.
    3. 25% or more of its total income, in the tax year from sales of the plant, are from sales in a particular market of at least 14 million inhabitants (or more – the amount increases yearly).
  • Preferred Income – Income from activities carried out in Israel. This includes a number of alternatives: income from the sale of products manufactured in the same plant, including their components manufactured in another plant, income from granting the right to use knowledge or software developed in the factory (for example, income from software usage fees), income from ancillary service for sales and income from research, and industrial development for a foreign resident for whom a scientist’s approval has been obtained.
  • The definition of a preferred company includes a company that was incorporated in Israel, legally manages ledgers, did not commit offenses, etc.

For the purpose of recognizing a preferred technological enterprise (as opposed to a preferred enterprise) and for its significant benefits – additional conditions are required:

  • The fixed conditions regarding a preferred plant as detailed above.
  • Expenditures classified as research and development expenses in accordance with accepted accounting practices (hereinafter: “R&D”) of the enterprise, in the three years preceding the tax year, were at least 7% on average per year of the company’s total revenue or exceeded NIS 75 million per year.

The Tax Authority Circular (09/2017) stipulates that they will be considered as recognized R&D expenses, including any of the following.

  • Wages, direct expenses, management and general expenses that were used directly for the R&D activity, cost of materials and everything provided that the costs were used for the company’s R&D activities directly.
  • The company that owns the plant must meet one or more of the following conditions:
    • 20% or more of the company’s employees are R&D employees or the company employs at least 200 R&D employees.
    • A venture capital fund has invested at least 8 million NIS in the company, and the company has not changed its line of business after the date of investment.
    • The company’s revenue turnover in the tax year and in the three tax years preceding it was NIS 10 million NIS or more, and its revenues in the three years preceding the tax year increased by an average of 25% or more compared to the tax year prior.
    • The company employed at least 50 employees in the tax year and in the three tax years that preceded it and the number of employees in the three years prior to the tax year increased by 25% or more on average compared to the tax year that preceded them.
    • Employs a person who is “not legally registered as an employee of the company but is at the disposal of the company provided that they exclusively work at the plant”. As to the conditions pertaining to the employee – in accordance with Circular 9/2017 (page 13) employee
    • The turnover of the company that owns the factory is less than 10 billion NIS.

Preferred Technological Income

Preferred technological income is income generated from an intangible asset which is wholly or partly owned by the enterprise, or which the enterprise has the right to use, including any of the following:

  1. Income from the granting of a right to use a beneficiary intangible asset.
  2. Revenue from a software-based service.
  3. Income from a product in which the plant made use of a beneficiary intangible asset.
  4. Income from an ancillary or supporting product to a computer program or product as stated in paragraph (3), provided that the product was directly related to the beneficiary intangible asset and one of the following exists for it:
    1. No other beneficiary property was used in its production.
    2. In its production, there was the use of another intangible asset not owned by the parent company or a related party, and which does not give a related party the right to use it.
  5. Income from ancillary service for the grant of a right of use, service, or product as stated in paragraphs 1-3 or supports any of those as stated in paragraphs 1-3, as the case may be.
  6. Income from the sale of research and development services that does not exceed 15% of the plant’s income.

*Intangible assets including copyright, software, etc.

Additional Conditions for a Technological Enterprise from Regulations to Encourage Capital Investments:

Regulation 3 of the Capital Investment Encouragement Regulations contains additional requirements for the existence of a technological enterprise:

  • The number of employees in Israel in a given year is greater than 20% of the number of workers employed in Israel in the two tax years prior to the year in which the company was considered a technological enterprise.
  • The cost of wages for Israel-based employees in a given tax year is greater than 20% of the average wage cost in the two tax years prior to the tax year in which the company was considered a technological enterprise.

*In some cases, instead of the additional conditions for a technological enterprise, it is possible to obtain approval from the National Authority for Technological Innovation. Technological income is part of the income derived from R&D in Israel according to the “Nexus” formula.

Nexus formula:

Total Revenue in IP x (130% x eligible expense for IP R&D/Total IP Expenses)

Total expenses, ie the denominator (including “bad” expenses):

Receipt of R&D services from related parties abroad, royalties to a foreign company, the cost of acquiring knowledge to a foreign company, purchase of an asset not made in Israel, undocumented “good” expenses, and R&D services by an unrelated party in Israel if the number of employees and their wages is reduced by 20% at least in the year the company was first considered a technological enterprise.

The formula will apply to all companies that implement the Capital Investment Encouragement Law as of 1/7/2021. In the case of an intangible asset purchased after 30/6/16, the formula will apply as early as 1/1/17.

In accordance with the Income Tax Circular 09/2017 – the software industry currently operates following the model of “software as a service” and not just in the business of licenses.

Moreover, in cases where no license is granted, access to software is provided via cloud computing or over the Internet and income will be considered technological income. Software-based services currently exist in various industries such as internet advertising, finance, and more. Revenue from such services are considered “technological revenue” provided that it is in fact derived from software. In this regard, it is important to emphasize the nature of a company’s activity as a software development company and not as a service-based company.

Additional Incentive Laws

The Angel Investment Act

The Angel Investment Act was passed as part of a temporary provision with the purpose of encouraging investors to fund business ventures in their early stages. The temporary order expired at the end of 2019, however, it is not inconceivable that the rationale underlying the temporary order will be reflected in further legislative proceedings soon.

Read here about the Law of Angels here.

Click here to read about other types of tax planning.

]]>
Stablecoins https://y-tax.co.il/en/stablecoins/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=stablecoins Fri, 07 Jan 2022 21:54:45 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=7165

Exploring Stablecoins as a Potential Hedge Against Cryptocurrency Volatility - Insights

As Bitcoin drops below USD 42,000 in early January, questions are being raised if the coin is a good measure of anything about its extremely high volatility.

Stablecoins Are designed to be “linked” to traditional Fiat Currency. For example, USDC for United States Dollar Coin is a cryptocurrency that is not affiliated with the United States Government but claims to keep its value tied to the USD.

“USDC is fully backed by cash and equivalents and short-duration U.S. Treasuries, so that it is always redeemable 1:1 for U.S. dollars. Each month, we publish attestation reports by Grant Thornton regarding the reserve balances backing USDC.” (Circle.com)

While USDC asserts that its assets are backed by US Treasury securities, skepticism remains due to past controversies in the crypto sector regarding the actual backing of such investments. This leads to a question: why wouldn’t investors simply choose traditional government-backed investments instead? For a US citizen, there might be reasons beyond the apparent to prefer holding assets in USDC over conventional options.

Moreover, the United States government has initiated research into the feasibility of a government-issued digital currency, known as a central bank digital currency (CBDC). As we progress through 2022, the evolving role of the U.S. economy in the global post-COVID recovery landscape could significantly highlight the true value of stablecoins in the cryptocurrency market.

At Nimrod Yaron & Co., we serve as a professional resource for individuals and companies invested in the global marketplace. We are specifically assisting with intelligent tax planning. Contact us today to learn about all of the services we offer.

]]>
CBDC Compete Crypto https://y-tax.co.il/en/cbdc-compete-crypto/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cbdc-compete-crypto Tue, 04 Jan 2022 18:57:18 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=7146

CBDCs are a Real Competitor for Cryptocurrency

CBDC Compete Crypto – In December 2021, the governments of France and Switzerland and their associated government-run central banks, along with commercial partner banks, completed Project Jura, a digital currency trial to settle transfers of significant funds between the country.

A CBDC, or a central bank digital currency, is just a form of a country’s money in a digital-only format. The most significant difference between this and crypto is that the CBDCs value, backed by the government that issues it, is the traditional backing of 21st-century currencies. Specifically, this was a trial for the large transactions that banks do between each other; this was not a test run for retail use, although that is in the works.

“The trial involved the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Swiss banks UBS (UBSG.S) and Credit Suisse (CSGN.S) and France’s Natixis, alongside Swiss bourse operator SIX, fintech R3, and consultancy Accenture (ACN.N).” (Reuters.com)

“During the three-day trial in November, 200,000 euros of commercial paper was issued against a wholesale CBDC and transferred between the banks, along with foreign exchange transactions ” (Retuters.com)

CBDC Compete Crypto

Comparing Cryptocurrencies to CBDCs, there are a few significant differences. The previously mentioned government backing of CBDCs is a considerable difference. Additionally, the oversight and regulation are vastly different. The global banking system is subject to stringent rules and auditing practices to ensure no materially misstated information that could harm bank users and investors. Lastly, although Cryptocurrency is advertised as decentralized, there are severe market manipulators. Big crypto exchanges, banks, and even countries are known for manipulating the market with large purchases and sales to benefit themselves. While this is also possible with CBDC, a more regulated space allows for a lower chance of market manipulation.

At Nimrod Yaron & Co., we serve as a professional resource for individuals and companies invested in the global marketplace. We are specifically assisting with intelligent tax planning. Contact us today to learn about all of the services we offer.

]]>
NFT’s Impact on the Environment https://y-tax.co.il/en/nfts-impact-on-the-environment/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=nfts-impact-on-the-environment Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:18:45 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=6941

NFT’s Impact

Different people, places, technologies, and companies enter the cryptoasset sphere; they focus on NFTs or Non-fungible Tokens. Often, minting or creating NFTs enables entities to generate hype or engage with their consumer base. However, as NFTs invade the marketplace more, their long-term sustainability raises questions – specifically about the environment. In global music news, famous Korean pop band BTS had attempted to enter the NFT space but was subject to intense public scrutiny. 
“The BTS fan base criticized the NFT push immediately. Hashtags opposing the move hit Twitter’s top-trending list last month, and the movement has continued since then. The bulk of the criticism centers on the large energy consumption needed for NFTs, which rely on blockchain technology and are usually bought with cryptocurrencies” (wsj.com)
Technologically, the advocates are talking about the environmental impact that NFTs create. When mining an NFT on the Ethereum blockchain, users must pay a “gas-tax” fee associated with the literal fuel used to power the computer placing the item on the network-shared ledger or blockchain. These gas taxes have been linked to extreme power consumption across the globe, relating to the use of fossil fuels, and in turn, climate change.  This obstacle, the blockchain’s environmental impact, is one of the most prolific and wide-standing public arguments against cryptocurrency. As the cryptoasset space matures, we will continue to learn more about how and what impacts are changing the global economy—eventually answering the crypto question. At Nimrod Yaron & Co., we serve as a professional resource for individuals and companies invested in the global marketplace. We are specifically assisting with intelligent tax planning. Contact us today to learn about all of the services we offer.
]]>
Puerto Rico – America’s Crypto Tax Haven https://y-tax.co.il/en/puerto-rico-americas-crypto-tax-haven/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=puerto-rico-americas-crypto-tax-haven Wed, 29 Dec 2021 22:18:10 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=6905

After the passage of the United States Internal Revenue Service section 933, also known as “Act 60”, there is a significant tax advantage for United States Residents and their Cryptocurrency income. Specifically, this new statute allows U.S. residents to move to the territory of Puerto Rico to take part in IRC 933.

Filing Criteria

U.S. citizens who are bona fide residents of Puerto Rico may have to file a U.S. income tax return. 

Income earned from Puerto Rican sources is exempt from U.S. income tax under section 933 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (except salaries and pensions received as a civilian or military employee of the United States government).

§ 933. Income from sources within Puerto Rico

The following items shall not be included in gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under this subtitle: 

(1) Resident of Puerto Rico for the entire taxable year 

In the case of an individual who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year, income derived from sources within Puerto Rico (except amounts received for services performed as an employee of the United States or any agency thereof); but such individual shall not be allowed as a deduction from his gross income any deductions or any credit, properly allocable to or chargeable against amounts excluded from gross income under this paragraph.

(2) Taxable year of change of residence from Puerto Rico 

In the case of an individual citizen of the United States who has been a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico for a period of at least 2 years before the date on which he changes his residence from Puerto Rico, income derived from sources therein (except amounts received for services performed as an employee of the United States or any agency thereof) which is attributable to that part of such period of Puerto Rican residence before such date; but such individual shall not be allowed as a deduction from his gross income any deductions properly allocable to or chargeable against amounts excluded from gross income under this paragraph.

Essentially, the law stipulates that if you spend more than half of the year within the territory of Puerto Rico, you are exempt from paying U.S. Federal Income Tax. There are a few additional requirements. However, this law would could citizens reduce their effective tax rate by 48%.

With the growth of cryptocurrencies over the past few years and their big return in recent months, it is possible for some investors that are thinking of cashing in long-term gains to consider the tax savings of making a move to Puerto Rico.

For Example, if you were a single filer in 2020 in the contiguous United States and had USD 100,000 of long-term capital gains and a traditional yearly wage of USD 70,000, you would pay $38,741.23 from the wages $15,000 from the crypto gains in Federal Income Tax.

If you were a Single filer in 2020 in the United States Territory, Puerto Rico, you with USD 100,000 long term capital gains and wages of USD 70,000 would pay USD 0 in long term capital gain taxes, and the wage’s taxes would depend on whether the company he works for is located within Puerto Rico or not. Either way, savings of at least USD $15,000 and could be up to 50% if the taxpayer is in a higher tax bracket for capital gains.

While the future of taxation on cryptocurrency is constantly changing for United States’ citizens, currently, Puerto Rico is an excellent place to be if you are looking to save significant amounts of money in Federal Income Taxes on your crypto gains.

At Nimrod Yaron & Co., we serve as a professional resource for individuals and companies invested in the global marketplace. We are specifically assisting with intelligent tax planning. Contact us today to learn about all of the services we offer.

]]>
The United States Changing Crypto Law https://y-tax.co.il/en/the-united-states-is-changing-crypto-law/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-united-states-is-changing-crypto-law Sat, 25 Dec 2021 20:13:20 +0000 https://y-tax.co.il/?p=6896

Among the limited number of Congress members addressing the topic, Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming) has been vocal about the emerging opportunities for crypto legislation in 2022.

Lummis, a member of the Senate Banking Committee, has previously mentioned her view that Bitcoin is an excellent hedge against changing fiat currency values. Lummis announced legislation that would create a more explicit role for crypto through the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC. Specifically, jurisdiction would be shared with the SEC and Commodities Futures Trading Commission. Their joint task would be to oversee the cryptoasset marketplace.

The new legislation could also enable new taxation policies federally regarding the purchase, sale, and trade of crypto. Notably, consumer protections are an essential facet of the new legislation as millions of USD are lost in crypto scams each year.

The United States Government has a difficult task, regulating the unregulated. How do you ensure consumer and citizen safety while keeping the marketplace open and free from manipulation? Will the government’s efforts remove the value in crypto, or at least disincentive it?

Lastly, the topic of regulation also leads to conflict within the legislators in Washington. Lummis has declared significant ownership in Bitcoin in her mandated filings. While not illegal by any means, it raises the question of conflicting interests. It is unclear precisely what type of legislation and guidelines about crypto will come out in the near future.

All that can be said at the end of 2021; changes are coming, regulations are probable. Does this impede on the essence of cryptocurrencies?

 

At Nimrod Yaron & Co., we serve as a professional resource for individuals and companies invested in the global marketplace. We are specifically assisting with intelligent tax planning. Contact us today to learn about all of the services we offer.

]]>